Relationship of ethics and political science

Professional Ethics in Political Science () | Ethics Codes Collection

relationship of ethics and political science

Ethics permeates the field of politics in many ways. The subfield of ethics in the Department of Political Science conceptualizes ethics broadly to include: (1) the. Ethics and politics are complex concepts, and there is a close relationship between them, which is revealed in the titles of the various studies that follow. Upon analyzing the ethics of discourse. This political space was the space of freedom. Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Assistant In political organization of Islam the ethics and politics are in agreement and.

The Politics offers a classification of different political orderings — the best ones, the most practical ones, and the most prevalent ones — and even though the best regimes and laws are aimed at the development of virtue, Aristotle oftentimes appears to operate with the understanding that politics is concerned with power, ambition and self-interest instead of noble public action.

This raises the questions of how, for Aristotle, ethics and politics are related? Why should the Nicomachean Ethics and the Politics should be read together? We welcome submissions on a range of sub- questions, such as: What is the relationship between the good citizen and the good man? What is the role of prudence in politics? What is the role of friendship in ethics and, possibly, in politics? What is the contribution of the contemplative life and the active life to human flourishing and to the political regime?

Ethics and Politics

What is the relationship between law and virtue? Is there a difference in methodology between the two treatises? All participants to the expert meeting are expected to have read both texts closely. Moreover, in connection with the appraisal of manuscripts, editors should take all reasonable precautions to avoid revealing the names of the author and the reader to each other. When a piece of writing is jointly authored, it is presumed to be the intellectual product of the authors collectively, not individually, and this fact should govern its further use including its use by any of the original authors.

Exceptions to this practice should occur only if a portion of the jointly authorized work has been clearly attributed in the original work to one of the authors.

relationship of ethics and political science

Authors who submit manuscripts to more than one professional journal at the same time are obligated to inform each editor of the fact. Political scientists seeking to reprint the previously published work of others have an ethical obligation to make sure that consent is obtained. The copyright holder should either obtain the consent of the author or require that this be done by the party seeking permission to reprint.

relationship of ethics and political science

Political scientists are encouraged to include in contracts with publishers a provision that the publisher must obtain the consent of the author or authors before allowing reprinting of the work. Either the copyright holder or the author may waive his or her right. Each may act on his or her own behalf, or by mutual consent one may act on behalf of both.

Ethics and politics

An author ordinarily is entitled to a complimentary copy of any publication in which his or her work is reprinted. Responsibilities of Editors and Contributors to Edited Volumes When a thesis or dissertation is published in whole or in part, the following rules apply: Open Listing Policy It is the professional obligation of all political science departments to list in eJobs, APSA's online job database, all positions for which they are recruiting at the Instructor, Assistant, and Associate Professor levels.

In addition, the listing of openings at the Full Professor level are strongly encouraged. It is also a professional obligation for departments to list temporary and visiting positions on eJobs. Institutions employing political scientists should abolish nepotism rules, whether they apply departmentally or to an institution as a whole.

Employment and advancement should be based solely on professional qualifications without regard for family relationships, subject only to appropriate rules governing conflict of interest. Institutions employing political scientists should make more flexible use of part-time positions for fully qualified professional women and men, just as is now done for those professionals with joint appointments or part-time research positions.

Part-time positions should carry full academic status, equivalent rank, promotion opportunities, equal rates of pay, commensurate departmental participation and commensurate fringe benefits, including access to research resources.

Ethics | Political Science | UCI Social Sciences

The policy of flexible part-time positions is not intended to condone any practice such as moonlighting or any practice by employers used to circumvent normal career-ladder appointments.

It is Association policy that educational institutions not discriminate against job candidates on the basis of gender, gender identity, race, color, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, physical handicap, disability, or religion except in those cases in which federal laws allow religious preference in hiring. Appropriate strategies may differ for each group. Fraud in Claiming Advanced Degrees Recommending a candidate for faculty appointment calls for honest and responsible judgment.

It is permissible for the employing institution to expect that members of its faculty will abide by institutional rules that do not violate principles of academic freedom or political rights of citizenship. A candidate should be informed if references to such matters are in his or her record and should have an opportunity to place in the record a statement relating to such matters.

Matters pertaining to the candidate that have no bearing on the legitimate expectations of the employing institution should not be mentioned.

If it is the department's policy to place such matters in an open file, or otherwise make these letters available to those who may desire to see them, then the department has an ethical obligation to inform the individual from whom a letter is requested that the letter will not be regarded as a confidential document.

If one who is requested to write a letter of evaluation is informed in advance that the letter will be placed in an open file, then it is proper to exercise the option of not writing such a letter.

relationship of ethics and political science

Furthermore, the refusal to write a letter should not be a matter of record. If they have not waived this right, the department has an obligation to inform the individuals from whom letters are requested that the confidentiality of their letters cannot be assured.

Once an individual accepts an offer of employment from an institution, it is incumbent upon the individual not to seek or accept further employment for the same initial contract year unless a prior release is secured from the hiring institution. Ethics in Tenure and Promotion Among the most serious responsibilities in the academic community is the assessment of colleagues for tenure and promotion.

As a matter of principle, a department should use the same procedures and, insofar as possible, similar criteria for all candidates under review for tenure and promotion.

  • Political ethics

The candidate being reviewed has a professional right to know the motivating principles, customary standards, and principal procedures of the assessment process of his or her department. The materials to be reviewed need not include all of the candidate's work, but should not exclude material the candidate judges indispensable to an assessment of his or her case.

External reviews are governed by a triad of rights and obligations: All three parties share certain values; these include a commitment to fairness, dispatch, and mutual respect.

Professional Ethics in Political Science (2008)

But obligations and rights are not the same for all parties; each may give these values differing weight, even conflicting interpretations. Guidelines, necessarily, must concern general principles. Guidelines for external review are not intended to be and should not be read as a uniform code to be applied to all universities and colleges alike. Academic departments differ, for example, in educational mission, institutional resources, access to external reviewers and size as well as in the administrative and legal constraints under which they operate.

The proper procedure for one department or institution may not be the same for others. Rights of the Candidate Obligations of the Department No presumption should be expressed that there is an obligation to perform service, but rather that it is a professional courtesy of assistance to the department making the request.

On the Relationship between Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Politics

Refusal to perform this service should not be regarded as a negative statement about the candidate. No reviews should be solicited for decisions that do not warrant them for example, in entry-level and adjunct appointments, renewals of junior appointments, and special increments at the senior level. Obligations of the External Reviewer Joint AAUP and AAC Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure The purpose of this statement is to promote public understanding and support of academic freedom and tenure and agreement upon procedures to assure them in colleges and universities.

Institutions of higher education are conducted for the common good and not to further the interest of either the individual teacher4 or the institution as a whole. The common good depends upon the free search for truth and its free exposition.