Imacon Ixpress 96C 16 M/P Digital Back For Hasselblad Autofocus. * Item pictured for illustrative purposes only, actual item not pictured. See ‘Notes’ next to . Imacon Ixpress V96C 16 Megapixel Digital Back for Hasselblad V System. * Item pictured for illustrative purposes only, actual item not pictured. See ‘Notes’ next. DESCRIPTION. Sensor: 16 megapixel CCD; 16 bit color; MB Single-shot files; Computer-free operation, with shot Image Bank; Optional 4*Res module.
|Published (Last):||27 January 2011|
|PDF File Size:||1.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.68 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I often agree with Graham, but in this case I’ll support the Ixpress route. You must log in or sign up to reply here. I forgot to add the dynamic range in the Ixpress’s favour. I don’t have time to shoot the same scene with both cameras right now so looked through my image catalogs for something similar. My opinion about it: If it’s time for a bit better camera, this is your Canon If it’s time for a bit better camera, this is your Canon by Lori Grunin.
True, the Kodak is self contained and the Ixpress requires “hulking” around the ImageBank, but it doesn’t bother me. Olloclip has new pro and entry-level lenses for your phone One of the top names in phone imzcon lenses imacoj has options for those who shoot oxpress little or a lot.
How to scan and archive your old printed photos How to scan and archive your old printed photos by Sharon Profis.
Digital The Imacon Ixpress V96C on test – Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
Digital photography begins its next chapter with radical changes Ixprrss photography remakes phone photos, while Canon and Nikon embrace the camera design of the future. Early backs provide excellent IQ.
MF cameras and lenses have a different look too. Yes Graham, You are right – should have attached a few images.
Is a square 37mm x imavon sensor worth it? Have any of you any experience with the early Imacon Ixpress backs? Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. One of the top names in phone camera lenses now has options for those who shoot a little or a lot.
The tiny Nano1 astronomy camera imacln for the stars The makers behind the Tiny1 astronomy camera are back with an even smaller shooter.
Additional Features Continuous Shooting Speed. Shutter Min Shutter Speed.
We delete comments that violate our policywhich we encourage you to read. Image quality is significantly better than my 5D even cropping down. Mobile by Stephen Shankland Dec 19, It is not worth taking this option, in my opinion, unless you already have the MF camera and glass waiting, which it seems you don’t. Gadgets by Gordon Gottsegen Nov 19, Perhaps you could post a few test images from both cameras. Nothing wrong with that but the same limitations apply.
Mobile Accessories by Joshua Goldman Nov i,acon, Smart Home by Gordon Gottsegen Nov 19, Half of the advantages of a good digital MF system will be missing but you will still have nice colour and low ISO performance, as well as fast flash sync. Sony Alpha mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera almost has it all Sony Alpha mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera almost has it all by Lori Grunin.
The Ixpress will lxpress files with significantly better color and dynamic range.
Imacon Ixpress 96c
Cameras by Aloysius Low Dec 6, Certainly the 5D would be more convenient to use, but the difference in IQ is umacon to jump out at you. Christian, That makes more sense and looks like a good offer. Being older does not mean it is no good. Optical Sensor Sensor Resolution. You won’t get such benefits and support from Kodak on their Kodak backs today.
Doesn’t this use the same size sensor as the Kodak? Computational photography remakes phone photos, while Canon and Nikon embrace the camera design of the future. The 5D files look flat and lifeless compared to P20 files. Eric, you know better than I would. Display Display Form Factor.
Imacon, now Hasselblad of course, will support this back.
Depends on you, but to me, it is. Your name or email address: Hi guys, I posted the question about the Kodak digital backs a few days ago, and it seems it is a bit of a risk, and way too expensive. Mobile Accessories by Joshua Goldman Nov 5, Want to take better photos and videos? Would this be a worthwile purchase along, ofcourse with a used H1 to mount the back on Share This Page Tweet. Definitely a better buy than the Kodak for various reasons – ISO can be varied from 50 to among many other benefits.
Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. Since I shot a lot of pics of my son I was able to find something sort of comparable at least same lighting and subject in the same location. These shots that I posted are in a tricky lighting situation – there is daylight coming in from windows but room is lit with halogen lights and lots of light reflected off of the yellow and green walls.
I also happen to like the Flexcolor software – not for the work flow, but for the image quality.