Can a President Be Too Strong? | Scholastic
"Congress passes laws delegating its legislative power to these that her " number one agenda" will be to write and "give President Obama a. By obstructing most legislation President Obama sends its way, Congress has weakened rather than exercised its power, says a Vanderbilt. The course of American history has led most presidents to want more power than the framers intended. Republican anger at President Obama.
As a matter of history, neither comes close to FDR Presidential "signing statements" are another concern. The first 39 presidents issued only The next three Reagan, Bush, Clinton issued By the start of his last year, George W.
Bush had issuedchallenging over 1, provisions of law, leading to accusations that he was selectively enforcing the will of Congress.
Federal regulation is another marker of executive power, as regulations assume the force of law. Between andthe Federal Register grew seven-fold to overpages. The executive branch has taken upon itself a large measure of legislative authority. James Madison made that point insaying that war is "the true nurse of executive aggrandizement. But the courts are slow and sometimes inconclusive.
A Congress jealous of its constitutional prerogatives is the other corrective. Presidential power becomes easier and, presidents argue, more necessary when Congress falters. In recent decades, this has been cause for concern. For example, Congress has let Presidents take the lead on immigration, health care, and the environment. It has ceded much trade authority and has weakened its treaty powers by enabling presidents to create "executive agreements" and other vehicles that require less than a two-thirds vote - and in some cases no vote at all.
Init passed the War Powers Act to limit a president's ability to go to war - but has failed to enforce it when ignored.
The current Congress has allowed itself to be ridiculed via demeaning tweets. Perhaps not surprisingly, a Gallup Poll found only eight percent of Americans with "quite a lot" or "a great deal" of confidence in Congress, the lowest of 15 major U.
Too Much Presidential Power? - Too Little Congress | HuffPost
A diminished Congress weakens our republican government. For example, the rejection by the current president of the executive actions of his predecessor, who also overturned many of the actions of his predecessor, leads to incoherent domestic policy. Both parts of government have to be seen working together for the people as opposed to setting one another up against the other.
However, it is through the power of recommendationagenda setting and lobbying that all modern presidents have organised their relationship with Congress.
Today, people on the presidential staff are assigned by the president simply to develop and cultivate his relationship with Congress. These people essentially have four main tasks: These people will tell a president when it is most advantageous to do something i.
These people identify obstacles to a recommendation and seek to suggest ways in which they can be navigated around. They also do their utmost to do what their political allies want them to do. This is almost an impossible task because the administration is so large at the Executive level and it is also difficult because individuals frequently pursue their own interests.
It is also an important task because individuals within the administration can do great harm to a president when they embark on their own individual agenda. As government has got bigger, so the problem this issue raises has got more difficult to solve. Successful presidents have to master the ability to persuade.
The Constitution separated the Executive and Legislative branches of government and therefore the president has no power over Congress. Hence he has to negotiate and bargain. No-one in the presidential staff is a member of the Legislative — nor are any of his political appointments within the Federal bureaucracy. Congress does not even have to physically respond to any presidential recommendation as they can pretend that it does not exist.
Therefore a president has to rely on developing good relations with Congress, good tactics, good powers of persuasion and bargaining in order to win support.
- The President and Congress
- Congress in danger of losing relevancy as presidents work around it
- Too Much Presidential Power? - Too Little Congress
A Republican president with a Democrat dominated Congress, faces obvious party loyalty and partisan issues. The opposite is also true. Even a Democrat president with a Democrat dominated Congress cannot guarantee their support as they are essentially regional representatives who stand or fall by the votes of those they represent — and a presidential recommendation might not be popular with rural people, as an example.
However, the politics of divided party control has frequently lead to president and Congress working together through this system of bargaining.
Can a President Be Too Strong?
If they did not, there would be a stand-still in American politics. Historically, Republican presidents have always had more success in dealing with a Democrat dominated Congress than a Democrat president with a Republican dominated Congress.
For six out of his eight years, Reagan had to work with a divided Congress and yet he is considered a very successful president in terms of his legislation. Any politician who failed to support this could be seen as being easy on communism when the Cold War was certainly around and the fear of the old USSR was real.
Democrat presidents have had real problems with Democrat dominated Congress. Kennedy found that many of his recommendations died in Congress, Carter rarely got anything through Congress. Clinton has fared much better with a Republican Congress than a Democrat one! Therefore a simple same-party majority between the president and Congress does not guarantee that the president will see his recommendations accepted.
This would indicate that the ideologies held by American politicians are not simply linked to one party.
Cross-party support for a certain issue can and does happen. If it did not happen, then, given the frequency with which presidents have to work with the opposing party in Congress, political gridlock would occur and politics would degenerate into a farce.
Congress invariably has to work with the president and vice versa if the system is not going to be held up to ridicule by the voting public and abroad.