Meet madcap flare books

Translation and Localization Services | MadTranslations

Oh, and we may have had a meeting of the MadCap UK and Europe Users of MadCap Flare” promovare-site.info MadCap Software is excited to announce the release of MadCap Pulse: the only social collaboration platform that enables technical authors. Importing FrameMaker books such as maintaining images with callouts and that provides significant improvements and new features that meet the needs of.

Unlike others, Google Editions would be completely online and would not require a specific device such as kindle, Nook, or iPad. Google passed 12 million books scanned. It was announced that Google intends to scan all known existing , books within a decade, amounting to over 4 billion digital pages and 2 trillion words in total. Google launched the Ngram Viewer, which collects and graphs data on word usage across its book collection.

A federal judge rejected the settlement reached between the publishing industry and Google. Google passed 20 million books scanned. Google reached a settlement with publishers.

Ruling in Authors Guild v. The appeals court sided with Google, declaring that Google did not violate copyright law. The US Supreme Court declined to hear the Authors Guild's appeal, which means the lower court's decision stood, and Google would be allowed to scan library books and display snippets in search results without violating the law.

Scanning operations had been slowing down since at leastas confirmed by the librarians at several of Google's partner institutions. At University of Wisconsin, the speed had reduced to less than half of what it was in However, the librarians have said that the dwindling pace could be a natural result of maturation of the project — initially stacks of books were entirely taken up for scanning whereas now Google only needed to consider the ones that have not been scanned already.

It commented that the decade-long legal battle had caused Google to lose its ambition.

Technical Documentation

Google Through the project, library books were being digitized somewhat indiscriminately regardless of copyright status, which led to a number of lawsuits against Google. By the end ofGoogle had reportedly digitized over seven million books, of which only about one million were works in the public domain. Of the rest, one million were in copyright and in print, and five million were in copyright but out of print.

Ina group of authors and publishers brought a major class-action lawsuit against Google for infringement on the copyrighted works. Google argued that it was preserving "orphaned works" — books still under copyright, but whose copyright holders could not be located. The settlement received significant criticism on a wide variety of grounds, including antitrust, privacy, and inadequacy of the proposed classes of authors and publishers.

The settlement was eventually rejected, [] and the publishers settled with Google soon after. The Authors Guild continued its case, and in their proposed class was certified. Google appealed that decision, with a number of amici asserting the inadequacy of the classand the Second Circuit rejected the class certification in Julyremanding the case to the District Court for consideration of Google's fair use defense.

Circuit Court of Appeals in New York.

meet madcap flare books

Google won the case unanimously based on the argument that they were not showing people the full texts but instead snippets, and they are not allowing people to illegally read the book. Kaplan saw their business radically change over twenty years. In the beginning, there was only Instructor-led Training ILTprinted books and reports for certification board review.

As learning delivery changed, they provided remote learning, and then added learning management system LMS delivery, and mobile app delivery. When Kaplan updated a product, they would change the content in the book, then copy and paste the changes to the other deliverables.

The process was labor-intensive, error-prone and their entire business model was built on how long it took to get the book out. Adopting DITA produced outstanding results: Instead of having lots of people working in publishing and layout, they can support additional products. By generating the output, they no longer have to manually update the content for specific delivery methods, which saves significant money and time.

This means that regardless of the way a student wants to learn, Kaplan can provide consistent, up-to-date instruction. The move to XML also improved content tracking and versioning; using a content management system, Kaplan can manage each question individually, including knowing in which deliverable each question is used.

This helps Kaplan avoid providing the same question to a learner who has taken different versions of the same course. How often does localization come into the loop? As the opportunities in China grow, companies can no longer require that their Chinese employees, such as technicians or customer engineers, speak English; instead, the companies need to provide their content in Chinese so that their employees can effectively sell and service their products locally.

Why do you think companies are slow at adopting DITA for their learning content? Companies fear they are going to go backward in terms of interface bells and whistles, like for instance interactions.

They fear DITA will limit them. Like many people, they can be hesitant to change their processes and their activities are siloed — their silos are based on the type of content they create: The idea of losing their autonomy, collaborating with the other stakeholders and changing how they work is scary. As new authoring and architecture support is developed, we expect a growing number of learning professionals to turn to DITA for their content.

They use few variables because in-sentence, they create problems during translation. Publishing based on TOC templates and target templates ensures consistency in structure and easy maintenance. Lynn will have another presentation on the second day to show how a wizard enables customers to compile exactly the documentation they need into a PDF.

A good balance between sessions and networking opportunities allowed us to trade quirky, but powerful solutions around Flare that users have come up with, to trade career stories and make new friends among a group of technical communicators as diverse and friendly as you could hope to find at any tech comm conference.

meet madcap flare books

And many smaller enhancements target the hardcore techcomm heavy users. The well-balanced improvements testify that MadCap listens to many of its users. An earlier post covered the more obvious strategic enhancements. Improved build times are probably the most crucial enhancement for us. That means a fast hard-disk drive with, say, RPM or a solid state disk help you to really benefit from the improvements.

Robustness is improved with a Crash Reporting System. Given our large projects, Flare could be really slow at times and occasionally crash. I like that Flare 10 has better exception handling and captures a lot of run-time errors with an error dialogue.

MadCap Flare | Kai's Tech Writing Blog

Customised project export allows you to tailor the content you share with other writers, translators or MadCap support. You can export projects not just as a whole, but also by selecting a target, a set of conditions or even file tag settings. I use file tags to track topic status and translation language — and I like that I can export complete, stand-alone projects which contain only the relevant topics. Customised review packages benefit from the same restrictions, and we can select a target or apply conditions to collect only relevant topics.

Oh, and topics in a review package now automatically bring along the snippets the link to which is a nice, intuitive touch. Drag-and-drop for conditions and variables makes it easier to select these elements which are now listed individually in the Project Organizer window and drop them into topics where I need them.

Apply conditions in the XML Editor. And sometimes, I lose track whether I have all scenarios covered. File navigation improvements benefits especially users who have a lot of topics and a lot of topic reuse. Find and Replace in Files has been revamped to offer more options for tailored results.

You can now search: